Captain Christian Mangena said Pistorius was most likely not wearing his prosthetic legs when he shot Reeva Steenkamp
A key police ballistics expert has
said Oscar Pistorius was not wearing his prosthetic legs when he shot his
girlfriend, as the athlete's trial continued in South Africa. Correspondents say this lends support to the defence team's insistence that
the shooting was not premeditated. Mr Pistorius denies murdering Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day 2013, saying
he thought she was an intruder. The prosecution says he intentionally shot her after an argument.
On day 13 of the trial, Captain Christian Mangena said analysis of the crime scene and his subsequent tests suggested that Mr Pistorius, 27, was not wearing the prostheses when he fired the fatal shots.
Capt Mangena also said that while he had not been able to determine the exact distance, the evidence pointed to the shots having been fired from a position greater than 60cm (23 inches) away from the toilet door but no further than 3m. Correspondents say this is in line with the athlete's testimony that he pulled the trigger while standing at the entrance to the bathroom.
Capt Mangena came across as professional and prepared and may have restored
some respect to the police service after a few blunders in the investigation. Mr
Roux is known for his gruelling style of questioning, but Capt Mangena showed no
doubt in his version of events, insisting: "That is my version. I will not
change my version."
It's no secret here that the police have limited resources compared to Mr Pistorius' highly paid team of experts. Proceedings have begun to resemble a childish game of "my experts are better than yours". But who will the court believe?
He said she then fell backwards before being hit in the
arm and the head by the last two bullets fired by Mr Pistorius through the
wooden door as she crossed both hands over her head to protect herself.
It's no secret here that the police have limited resources compared to Mr Pistorius' highly paid team of experts. Proceedings have begun to resemble a childish game of "my experts are better than yours". But who will the court believe?
'She dropped immediately'. Contradicting the athlete's testimony that the shots had been fired in close succession, Capt Mangena said there had been a short break between the first and second shots and that the second bullet missed Ms Steenkamp. Correspondents say this corroborates evidence given by a neighbour who said she heard a shot, then a pause, then three further shots. It also suggests that Ms Steenkamp may have had time to scream before she fell to the floor, supporting the neighbour's testimony that she had heard a woman screaming.
"I'm of the opinion that after [the first] wound was inflicted... she dropped immediately," Capt Mangena said. She then slumped into a "seated or semi-seated position" on top of a magazine rack, according to the police officer.
After the third and fourth shots she "ended up with her head on top of the toilet seat, and the lower part of her body on the rack", Capt Mangena added.
But defence lawyer Barry Roux contested Capt Mangena's evidence on the timing, maintaining that the bullets could have been fired in quick succession using a "double tap" technique - where the trigger is pulled in quick succession.
Capt Mangena insisted this was "impossible", saying that if this had been the case then Ms Steenkamp's wounds would have been in the same area of her body.
The court was adjourned until Monday after the prosecution said it would only call on five more witnesses. There are no juries at trials in South Africa, and the fate of Mr Pistorius will ultimately be decided by the judge, assisted by two assessors.
If found guilty, the 27-year-old - a national sports hero and double amputee dubbed the "blade runner" because of the prosthetic limbs he wears to race - could face life imprisonment.
INTERACTIVE view of Pistorius home
No comments:
Post a Comment
Through this ever open gate
None come too early
None too late
Thanks for dropping in ... the PICs