Monday, January 21, 2019

Super Blood Wolf Moon ... Skywatcher's delight

 
21 January Lunar eclipse
 
A lunar eclipse, which some are referring to as a "super blood wolf moon", has delighted skywatchers around the world.
During the spectacular event, the Earth's natural satellite turns a striking shade of red.
The entire eclipse was visible from North and South America, as well as parts of western Europe and north Africa.

What is a total lunar eclipse?

This kind of eclipse occurs when the Earth passes precisely between the Sun and the Moon.

Super blood wolf moon
In this situation, the Sun is behind the Earth, and the Moon moves into the Earth's shadow.
 
Blood moon explanation graphic
 
A full moon rises between clouds as a landing commercial jet approaches the airport before the start of a total lunar eclipse that is called a "Super Blood Wolf Moon" in San Diego, California

Will the moon appear red?

Yes. Some commentators are referring to the event as a "super blood wolf moon". The "super" part comes from the fact that the Moon will be near its closest approach to the Earth - when it will be marginally bigger in the sky than usual. The "wolf" part comes from the name given to full moons in January - "wolf moons".
Walter Freeman, an assistant teaching professor at Syracuse University in New York state, said: "A little bit of sunlight is refracted by the Earth's atmosphere and reaches the Moon, bending around the edges of the Earth. This small amount of red light still illuminates the Moon enough for us to see.

The moon seen beside a quadriga on top of the Cinquantenaire arch in Brussels

The moon seen beside a quadriga on top of the Cinquantenaire arch in Brussels
 
Super blood wolf moon through trees at night

Where was it visible?

The eclipse began at 02:35 GMT on Monday and ended at 07:49 GMT, but the point of greatest eclipse occurred at 05:12 GMT.
In the UK, the Moon was above the horizon throughout the eclipse, though from the extreme south-east of England the Sun had risen as the eclipse ended
This eclipse was also visible in north-western France, north-western Spain, Portugal, a small part of west Africa, almost the whole of North and South America, the eastern Pacific, and the north-eastern tip of Russia.

Was it safe to look at?

While solar eclipses are dangerous to view directly, the light from lunar eclipses is much fainter and so is completely safe to view without special equipment.

Why is it significant?

The event was the last chance for skywatchers to see a total lunar eclipse in its entirety until 2029 - weather permitting.

Super blood wolf moon and church


Thanx to BBC

Mr Trump...Get Your facts straight

 
A standoff over funding for President Donald Trump's long-promised border wall has resulted in the longest-ever shutdown of the US government. Mr Trump argues $5.7bn  is needed to address a "humanitarian and security crisis" at the southern border and has warned the shutdown will continue until he gets the cash.
Democrats say the wall is a waste of taxpayers' money and accuse the Trump administration of creating a "manufactured crisis".
Here are seven charts and maps that try to explain where we are with the wall and what the situation is like at the US-Mexico border.

1. Trump hasn't built very much of his wall. Before Mr Trump took office, there were 654 miles (just over 1,000km) of barrier along the southern border - made up of 354 miles of barriers to stop pedestrians and 300 miles of anti-vehicle fencing.

 
 
In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Mr Trump promised to build a wall along the border's entire 2,000-mile length. He later clarified that it would only cover half of that - with nature, such as mountains and rivers, helping to take care of the rest.
But, since Mr Trump entered the White House, although some of the already existing barriers have been replaced, no construction on any extension to the wall has yet been started. Overall, Congress has so far approved $1.7bn in funding for 124 miles of new and replacement barrier since Mr Trump entered the White House.
Just over 40 miles of replacement barriers have been built or begun. Construction is expected to start on 61 more miles of replacement barrier in 2019. This means just building replacement sections of about 15% of existing structures. The first construction on any extension to the existing structures will start in February in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas. The twin projects will cover a total of 14 miles - one barrier stretching six miles and the other eight miles.
Despite Mr Trump's continued determination to see a wall along the border, a survey this month by the Pew Research Center suggests the majority of Americans - 58% - oppose substantially expanding it, while 40% support it.

2. No-one really knows how much it would cost
A number of widely different estimates for a concrete wall have been put forward by official and unofficial bodies - ranging from $12bn to $70bn.
 
 
Mr Trump's initial price tag of between $8bn and $12bn and for a wall covering half the length of the border was widely disputed.
The 650 miles of fencing built under President George W Bush cost an estimated $7bn, and it could not be described as fulfilling Mr Trump's promises of a "tall, powerful, beautiful" barrier. However, Mr Trump is now asking for $5.7bn in addition to the $1.7bn already allocated for new and replacement barriers.
The Department of Homeland Security previously estimated a wall spanning half the border would cost up to $25m, but it has now said it is still looking at options to determine the price tag.
US Customs and Border Protection says that, on average, it costs approximately $6.5m per mile to construct a new border wall or replace existing legacy fence.

3. Trump wanted concrete, but is now talking about steel. Mr Trump has changed his view of what constitutes a wall. His promise to build a "big, beautiful wall" between the US and Mexico was a rallying cry throughout his election campaign. And early on, when he described it, he talked about concrete.
But once elected, he began talking about a barrier made of steel, so that border agents could see through it. And in October 2017, when the Trump administration revealed eight 30ft-tall wall prototypes - they were a combination of concrete and metal.
 
 
Since December, Mr Trump has said he does not want to build a concrete wall at all, but instead wants "artistically-designed steel slats". And just before the government shutdown, he tweeted an image of the design of his "steel slat barrier", which he said was "totally effective while at the same time beautiful.
 Officials at the US Customs and Border Protection agency have said none of the Trump administration prototypes tested in 2017 met its operational requirements.

4. The number of apprehensions at the southern border has declined over time. Mr Trump said in a national address in early January that a wall was needed to stem a "growing humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border", involving "thousands of illegal immigrants".
In exchanges with House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Mr Trump also said that people were "pouring into our country". However, figures show that illegal border crossings have seen an overall decline since 2000


In 2000, 1.6 million people crossed the border illegally, while last year that number was just under 400,000. In 2017, Mr Trump's first year in office, they were the lowest they had been since 1971.
Every congressperson along southern border opposes the border wall, arguing it would not improve security.
"I think building a concrete structure sea to shining sea is the most expensive and least effective way to do border security," said Republican Will Hurd, who represents more of the southern border than any other member of Congress.
Arrests and asylum requests went up in 2018.
 


Among these groups were a rising number of families fleeing violence in Central America and surrendering themselves to US authorities at the border. Many have told officials that they fear returning to their home countries.
Some have blamed the decision to slash the number of refugees allowed into the US under the Refugee Admissions Program for the rise in such claims for asylum at the border.
To apply for refugee status in the US, foreign nationals must obtain permission to enter the country before travelling, but those arriving at the US border are able to claim asylum "defensively" to prevent them from being deported back to a situation of "credible fear". Such claims are then referred to the Asylum Officers of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services. And despite Mr Trump's claims, any new border barrier is unlikely to stop these migrants legally claiming asylum at a port of entry.

6. Most illegal immigration is from visa 'overstayers', not people crossing the border. Although Mr Trump has blamed the southern border for illegal immigration, most actually arises because people overstay their visas.
While almost 400,000 people were apprehended trying to cross the southern border illegally last year, more than 700,000 people who entered the US legally overstayed their expected departure date in 2018, according to the DHS.
 

Canadians were the highest group of overstayers, according to DHS figures, followed by Mexicans and Brazilians. Although the number of overstayers  dropped to around 420,000 in May 2018 - it was still more than the number of people arrested trying to enter illegally via the Mexico-US border.
 

7. The wall is unlikely to stop drugs coming into the US. Mr Trump has claimed 90% of heroin comes across the southern border and that a wall would help the fight against drugs. Nationwide heroin seizures reached 7,979kg in 2017, with 39% seized at the US-Mexico border.
While most of the heroin in the US does come from Mexico, the DEA says the majority of it is smuggled in through legal ports of entry, hidden in privately-owned vehicles or transporter trucks, mixed with other goods.
Only a small percentage of the heroin seizures were between entry points - where barriers exist or are proposed. In fact, there are already barriers in border patrol sectors with the highest volumes of heroin seizures. 
 Although Trump manufactures almost all his statistics. The real facts are available to anyone who is really interested in the truth.

Thanx to the BBC

Why not?? ...It's Funny



Saturday, January 19, 2019

Trump says he'll make a 'major announcement' about the government shutdown on Saturday

Business Insider           DAVID CHOI           Jan 18th 2019 
President Donald Trump said he will make a "major announcement" regarding the US-Mexico border on Saturday afternoon.

The scheduled announcement will be held as the partial government shutdown nears the one-month mark.
Trump continues to face opposition against his plan to fund a barrier along part of the US-Mexico border by Democrats and some Republican lawmakers, culminating in the government shutdown that has affected about 800,000 federal and contract employees.

As the US government nears the one-month mark in partial shutdown mode, President Donald Trump said he would make a "major announcement" regarding the US-Mexico border on Saturday.

"I will be making a major announcement concerning the Humanitarian Crisis on our Southern Border, and the Shutdown, tomorrow afternoon at 3 P.M., live from the [White House]," Trump tweeted on Friday afternoon.

Trump continues to face opposition against funding for a barrier along part of the US-Mexico border by Democrats and some Republican lawmakers. The debates culminated into the ongoing government shutdown that has affected around 800,000 federal and contracted employees.

But the feud between Trump and Congress escalated this week, after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested he reschedule his State of the Union address due to security concerns. The next day, Trump canceled a congressional delegation trip to Afghanistan, which  Pelosi and other lawmakers were scheduled to attend. The military aircraft reserved for the lawmakers was pulled around an hour before they were scheduled to depart.

Trump has previously said he was considering declaring a national emergency to secure the over $5 billion for his border barrier, despite concerns from some Republicans. Critics have argued that Trump's characterization of a "crisis" at the border, including illegal immigration and crime rates, have been greatly exaggerated.

Trump's Republican colleagues have worried that a national-emergency declaration designed just to get Trump his desired border wall could set a troubling precedent that might affect disputes between Congress and future presidents.

Trump gave Putin the 'gift of the century' in plain sight while the FBI probed him as a Russian agent
Trump threatened to 'devastate' a NATO ally's economy, and his State Department has no idea that means
The Trump administration has been itching for a fight with Iran, but Mattis held it back. Now he's gone.
Democrats are calling for Trump's impeachment after bombshell report alleging he instructed Cohen to lie to Congress 
Melania Trump reportedly took a military plane to Florida, hours after Trump canceled Nancy Pelosi's flight because of the shutdown 
Ann Coulter doubles down: Trump will be 'dead in the water' if he doesn't build the wall
Stay tune  : As The Stomach Turns"
Thanx  David  Choi
Lets hear from Witchy 
This is what  Trump will announce. "I'm happy to announce that "I" am issuing an order to open up the government, no thanks to Nancy Pelosi and the democrats I might add, so that our great American federal workers can return to work by Tuesday so they can start getting paid again. We all want to earn a paycheck am I right??. I'm asking for all offices to open immediately so we can get our workers back to work. If the Democrats will not help our American citizens in need, then I'll do it to make sure our citizens are no longer struggling to live. Oh and I am great, I am the word, over and out".  Well he'll say something close to that anyway.
The Trumps have got to be the worse people who ever lived in the White House!  People are not getting paid for their work, no money for food and utilities, the House Majority Leader, cannot get a government plane to go to the war zone and see our troops--yet--the First Lady Melania, can get a government plane to fly her to Florida for the warm weather!  Unbelievable!  What will it take to get the low class, greedy, selfish Trumps out of our White House and back to where they belong!
This CON MAN is trying his best to DISTRACT, DEFLECT, DETRACT from the Muller probe and the report that is soon to be published. He is doing it at the EXPENSE & COST of over 800,000 hard working American workers & their families. IT'S NOT ABOUT THE WALL. IT'S ALL ABOUT HIS IMPENDING INDICTMENT & POSSIBLE IMPEACHMENT that his is PETRIFIED & SCARED STIFF.

" A NOTE TO MRS. PELOSI"
Mrs. Pelosi, there are reports that you have increased your offer for border security, I presume this responds to some backroom deal to get the Government reopened.   Now Mr. Trump says that he will make a big announcement tomorrow about the shutdown so it seems it is not a coincidence.   Trump owns this shutdown and the people know that him and the Republicans are solely responsible; there is no need to offer additional funds, there is also no need to consider a short term reopening.   He is digging his own grave and the public sentiment is turning frenetic.  There is no need to help him out.   We have demanded and insist that he be indicted with impeachment charges.   We feel that we  have a clear conscience in this shutdown and there is no need to try and appease this President.  Mrs. Pelosi, do not sell us out.
Nuff said   HeHe

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Ex-Trump lawyer: Rigging polls 'was at the direction of' Trump

       
                                       Michael Cohen
THOMSON REUTERS               Jan 17th 2019 
WASHINGTON, Jan 17 (Reuters) - Michael Cohen, a former lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump, said on Thursday he paid a firm to manipulate online polling data "at the direction of and for the sole benefit of" Trump.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Cohen had paid the data firm Redfinch Solutions to manipulate two public opinion polls in favor of Trump before the 2016 presidential campaign.

"As for the @WSJ article on poll rigging," Cohen said on Twitter on Thursday, "what I did was at the direction of and for the sole benefit of @realDonaldTrump @POTUS. I truly regret my blind loyalty to a man who doesn't deserve it."

The attempts to influence the polls ultimately proved largely unsuccessful but does shed a light on the tactics of the Trump campaign and Cohen's role within it. On the campaign trail, Trump frequently referred to his polling numbers to help fuel his candidacy.

Last month Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison for his role in making illegal hush-money payments to women to help Trump’s 2016 campaign and lying to Congress about a proposed Trump Tower project in Russia

The Journal said Cohen commissioned John Gauger, who runs RedFinch Solutions, to write a computer script to repeatedly vote for Trump in a February 2015 Drudge Report poll on potential Republican candidates. The move came as Trump was preparing to enter the 2016 presidential election race, the newspaper reported.

Trump ranked fifth in the Drudge Report poll, with about 24,000 votes or 5 percent of the total, according to the Journal .

Cohen also commissioned Gauger to do the same for a 2014 CNBC online poll identifying the country's top business leaders, although Trump was unable to break the top 100 candidates, the Journal reported.

"The president has no knowledge of the polls being rigged," Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani said in an interview with Reuters. RedFinch Solutions did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Reporting by Makini Brice and Tim Ahmann; Additional reporting by Karen Freifeld and Nathan Layne; Editing by Doina Chiacu)
Stay tune   "As The Stomach Turns"

Witchy's opinion :
The FBI seized all of Cohen's records and are in possession of that hard evidence.  Cohen was caught lying 'ON BEHALF' of trump. He has now agreed to cooperate and tell the truth which MUST be backed up by hard evidence.  'NO ONE' is just taking his "word" for anything. He stands to lose a lot if he is caught lying  , that's why trump was very upset that the FBI broke into his attorney's office. 
I hope he 'NEVER' stops tweeting.  He's so ridiculous and he just keeps digging himself deeper.  I honestly think he doesn't understand that every one of his tweets are official Presidential record.  Please, don't take his phone away.  It's hilarious. Trump is going down in flames along with his cult.  Expect criminal indictments and treason charges against the orange tyrant.  Putin is going to be very unhappy. Everybody knew that Trump rigged Primaries and General Election.

Nixon got away by resigning but most of the Trump family members are headed for prison . He's not man enough to admit when he's beaten. He's wrong on so many levels, but his ego can't accept the facts.
Trump will not survive 2019. The republicans are facing a daily onslaught of criminal and unethical behavior being exposed about Trump and his administration/election campaign.

Hey Rudy, how far you gonna ride the "he had no knowledge" defense. He either knew all (like I believe) or he is the most incompetent manager of a team I ever heard of. In either case, he shouldn't be President.  I've pointed out all along, everything Trump accuses his opponents of doing is what he himself has been doing all along just to take attention away from himself. He cries "FAKE NEWS" when he is the one lying. He declares "rigged election" when his campaign was working with Russia to impact the results. He spouts "fake polls" when... you guessed it... he was the one rigging the polls. I could go on, but why bother? 

Trump is a fraud and a disgrace.
Its going to take a lot of bleach to scrub the dirty, orange stain this "man" has left in the white house.

back soon with another  istallment  of As The Stomach  Turns  about the  Orange Monkey im the  White House .... HeHe

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Theresa May's Brexit deal Rejected by record vote

 Image result for images of theresa May arguing in parliament
 
After a marathon debate, where tempers frayed and emotions ran high, the prime minister's Brexit deal was backed by 202 MPs but 432 voted against it. Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit deal has been rejected by 230 votes - the largest defeat for a sitting government in history.The deal sets out the terms of Britain's exit from the EU on 29 March.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has now tabled a vote of no confidence in the government, which could trigger a general election. The confidence vote is expected to be held at about 1900 GMT on Wednesday.
The defeat is a huge blow for Mrs May, who has spent more than two years hammering out a deal with the EU.

The plan was aimed at bringing about an orderly departure from the EU on 29 March, and setting up a 21-month transition period to negotiate a free trade deal. The vote was originally due to take place in December, but Mrs May delayed it to try and win the support of more MPs.
The UK is still on course to leave on 29 March but the defeat throws the manner of that departure - and the timing of it - into further turmoil.

MPs who want either a further referendum, a softer version of the Brexit proposed by Mrs May, to stop Brexit altogether or to leave without a deal, will ramp up their efforts to get what they want, as a weakened PM offered to listen to their arguments.
History was made tonight with the scale of this defeat - a higher figure than the wildest of numbers that were  guessed at before the vote.

But the prime minister's dilemma is a more serious version of the same it's always been. She has no majority of her own in Parliament to make her moderate way through stick. And her many critics don't agree on the direction she should take - a more dramatic break with the EU, or a tighter, softer version.
Those two fundamental and clashing positions have always threatened to pull her and the government apart.
 
Theresa May was accused fudging the statistics she used to support her argument during Prime Minister's Questions
 
The Brexit debate has cut across traditional party lines.

Some 118 Conservative MPs - from both the Leave and Remain wings of her party - voted with the opposition parties against Mrs May's deal. And three Labour MPs supported the prime minister's deal: Ian Austin, Kevin Barron, and John Mann
The most controversial sticking point was the issue of the Northern Irish backstop - the fallback plan to avoid any return to physical border checks between the country and Ireland.

Mrs May had hoped new assurances from EU leaders this week, saying the backstop would be temporary and, if triggered, would last for "the shortest possible period", would help her garner more support.  But in the debate leading up to the vote, members from all sides of the House said the move did not go far enough.

In normal times, such a crushing defeat on a key piece of government legislation would be expected to be followed by a prime ministerial resignation. But Mrs May signalled her intention to carry on in a statement immediately after the vote.
"The House has spoken and this government will listen," she told MPs.
She offered cross-party talks to determine a way forward on Brexit, if she succeeded in winning the confidence vote.
 
 May reacts after her Brexit Plan is crushed by an overwhelming vote
 
Former foreign secretary and leading Brexiteer Boris Johnson said it was a "bigger defeat than people have been expecting" - and it meant Mrs May's deal was now "dead".
But he said it gave the prime minister a "massive mandate to go back to Brussels" to negotiate a better deal, without the controversial Northern Ireland backstop. And he said he would back Mrs May in Wednesday's confidence vote

Labour MP Chuka Umunna said that if his leader did not secure a general election, Mr Corbyn should do what the "overwhelming majority" of Labour members want and get behind a further EU referendum.

Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable, who also wants a second referendum, said Mrs May's defeat was "the beginning of the end of Brexit" - but conceded that campaigners would not get one without Mr Corbyn's backing.

Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said Mrs May had suffered "a defeat of historic proportions" and called again for the Article 50 "clock to be stopped" in order for another referendum to take place.
"We have reached the point now where it would be unconscionable to kick the can any further down the road," she said.

However, government minister Rory Stewart said there was no majority in the Commons for any Brexit plan, including another referendum 
 
How a confidence motion works
Under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011, UK general elections are only supposed to happen every five years. The next one is due in 2022.
But a vote of no confidence lets MPs decide on whether they want the government to continue. The motion must be worded: "That this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government."

If a majority of MPs vote for the motion then it starts a 14-day countdown. If during that time the current government, or any other alternative government cannot win a new vote of confidence, then an early general election would be called. That election cannot happen for at least 25 working days.

MPs are set to debate Labour's no confidence motion for about six hours following Prime Minister's Questions at 1200.  Mr Corbyn said it would allow the House of Commons to "give its verdict on the sheer incompetence of this government". But DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party, which keeps Mrs May in power, would be supporting her in Wednesday's confidence vote. She said that MPs had "acted in the best interests of the entire United Kingdom" by voting down the deal.
But she added: "We will give the government the space to set out a plan to secure a better deal.''
In her statement to MPs, Mrs May said she planned to return to the Commons next Monday with an alternative plan - if she survives the confidence vote.
She said she would explore any ideas from cross-party talks with the EU, but she remained committed to delivering on the result of the 2016 referendum.

But European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said the risk of a disorderly Brexit had increased as a result of the deal being voted down.
He said the agreement was "the only way to ensure an orderly withdrawal" and that he and President of the European Council, Donald Tusk, had "demonstrated goodwill" with additional clarifications this week to put MPs minds at rest.
"I urge the United Kingdom to clarify its intentions as soon as possible," he said. "Time is almost up."
Mr Tusk said he regretted the outcome of the vote and later tweeted to ask "who will finally have the courage to say what the only positive solution is?"


Donald Tusk
✔ @eucopresident 


If a deal is impossible, and no one wants no deal, then who will finally have the courage to say what the only positive solution is?
End of Twitter post by @eucopresident

A statement from the Irish government also said it regretted the decision and that it "continues to believe that ratification of this agreement is the best way to ensure an orderly withdrawal of the UK".
It also said it will "continue to intensify preparations" for a no deal Brexit.

Monday, January 14, 2019

Investigators sought to evaluate whether Trump was potential threat to national security

Thomson Reuters ·


The New York Times reported that the FBI launched a probe days after U.S. President Donald Trump fired James Comey as FBI director in May 2017, and said the agency's counterintelligence investigators had to consider whether Trump's actions constituted a possible threat to national security.

U.S. President Donald Trump avoided directly answering when asked whether he "currently is or has ever worked for Russia" after a published report said law enforcement officials, concerned about his behaviour after he fired FBI director James Comey in 2017, had begun investigating that possibility.
Trump said it was the "most insulting" question he'd ever been asked, as he spoke to Fox News interviewer Jeanine Pirro, a personal friend, on Saturday night about a New York Times article published on Friday.
He never answered Pirro directly about working "for Russia," but went on to assert that no president has taken a harder stance against Russia than he has.
"I think it's the most insulting thing I've ever been asked," Trump said. "I think it's the most insulting article I've ever had written, and if you read the article you'll see that they found absolutely nothing."
"If you ask the folks in Russia, I've been tougher on Russia than anybody else, any other ... probably any other president, period, but certainly the last three or four presidents," he said.
Concerns reportedly led to investigation
A second prominent newspaper, the Washington Post, is also reporting that Trump had dealings with the Kremlin that raised suspicions. Both cite unidentified former law enforcement officials and others familiar with the allegations.
In a Post article published Sunday, the paper reported that Trump has gone to "extraordinary lengths" to keep the details about his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin under wraps.
The Post said Trump "took possession of the notes of his own interpreter" after meeting with Putin in 2017 in Hamburg, Germany.

The Times reported on Friday that Trump was investigated after he fired Comey. Agents allegedly feared Trump was acting in the interests of Russia, and against the United States, in the early months of his presidency, and that gave federal law enforcement officials reason to begin an investigation.
Slow to implement sanctions, Democrat says
Trump's claim that he's been tougher on Russia than any recent president was disputed by the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee.

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin meet during the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. The Washington Post has reported that Trump kept details of their conversation under wraps
 
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer says he'll force a vote in the coming days on the Treasury Department's decision to ease sanctions on three companies connected to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
The Times reported that FBI agents and some top officials became suspicious of Trump's ties to Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign, but didn't open an investigation at that time because they weren't sure how to approach such a sensitive probe.
Mark Warner said almost all the sanctions on Russia arose not in the White House but in Congress, due to concerns by members of both parties about Moscow's actions. Warner accused the White House of being very slow to put in place the penalties.

In the inquiry, counterintelligence investigators sought to evaluate whether Trump was a potential threat to national security. They also sought to determine whether Trump was deliberately working for Russia or had unintentionally been influenced by Moscow. Trump's behaviour in the days around Comey's May 2017 firing helped trigger the counterintelligence part of the probe, according to the newspaper.
Trump tweeted early Saturday that the report showed that the FBI leadership "opened up an investigation on me, for no reason & with no proof" after he had fired Comey.
 

Donald J. Trump         @realDonaldTrump

Wow, just learned in the Failing New York Times that the corrupt former leaders of the FBI, almost all fired or forced to leave the agency for some very bad reasons, opened up an investigation on me, for no reason & with no proof, after I fired Lyin’ James Comey, a total sleaze!


Robert Mueller took over the investigation when he was appointed special counsel soon after Comey's firing. The overall investigation is looking into Russian election interference and whether Trump's campaign co-ordinated with the Russians, as well as possible obstruction of justice by Trump. The Times says it's unclear whether Mueller is still pursuing the counterintelligence angle.

Sen. Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, said the report "may well suggest what it was that helped start this investigation in the first place."
He and other Democratic senators said this report and others within the past week questioning Trump's behaviour toward Russia give new urgency to the need for the Mueller investigation to be allowed to run its course.


House judiciary committee chairman Jerrold Nadler said his panel 'will take steps to better understand' Donald Trump's dealings with Russia in the first year of his presidency and the FBI's response to his behaviour. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)
 
Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani told the Times he had no knowledge of the inquiry but said that since it was opened a year and a half ago and they hadn't heard anything, indicating apparently "they found nothing."
Trump has also repeatedly and vociferously denied collusion with the Russians.
Warner spoke Sunday on CNN's State of the Union and Coons on Fox News Sunday.
Warner weighed in on the Trump-Putin summit last year in Helsinki, Finland, telling CNN, "The American government does not know what was discussed between Trump and Vladimir Putin in that frankly pathetic, embarrassing encounter where Trump was kowtowing on the world stage to Vladimir Putin in Helsinki."